Recently I’ve gotten pretty interested in some of Brian Ferneyhough’s ideas about music, especially what he has to say about his use of rhythm, duration and time. I have misgivings about a lot of his work, but I’ve become fond of Bone Alphabet, a piece for seven percussion instruments of indeterminate sound where adjacent instruments must not be of the same family. There’s an article by Steven Schick about the process of learning Bone Alphabet, which took him a maybe-not-totally-justifiable nine months. To get it right he cut up the score and pasted it on to graph paper so he could see the rhythms more clearly, did quite a bit of math to understand the polyrhythms, memorized stickings measure by measure, and other such feats of dedication and devotion. The result was, interestingly, a feeling of being deeply situated within his body. He talks quite a bit about the importance of bodily movement to the piece, mentioning at one point that an audio recording alone would not really convey the work. Here’s a good excerpt (Schick 1994):
My method of actually learning the piece involved first cutting out each bar and gluing it on graph paper so that I could better calculate rhythmical relationships. Then I made all decisions regarding sticking and mallet choice and memorized them before going on to the next measure. The advantage to this approach was that, by memorizing as the first and not the last step in the process, I could more quickly embed the material I was learning in the realm of physical gesture. As a result, from the first instant the piece became a theatrical arena where physical gesture was not the simple by-product of performance, but an integral part of a growing interpretive point of view. The instrument became a kind of stage for the enactment of, in Ferneyhough’s words, “a theatre of the body.”
Ross Karre has recorded his interpretation of Bone Alphabet and put it on YouTube. Unfortunately embedding is disabled, so to view it you’ll have to follow these links:
And, finally, a couple of quotes from Ferneyhough to round this all out. From his essay Duration and rhythm as compositional resources:
Whilst the impulse-structure and its audibility are clearly variably perceptible in concrete compositional situations, I maintain that enough of a correspondence is maintained in the middle to long term to enable the flow of space/density ratios demonstrated capable of carrying the main weight of formal organization. According to this principle, degrees of compression, distortion, convergence or mutual interference are calculable in respect of the degree to which the sense of clock time is supported or subverted by the specific tactility of impulse density setting the ‘inner clock’ of a particular metric space.
—
As always in the discussion of matters artistic, it is not the clear-cut cases which prove most pertinent, but the ill-defined and fluctuating ‘grey zones’ where a given rhythmic phenomenon may be called on to assume multiple functional roles.
References:
- Schick, S. (1994) Developing an Interpretive Context: Learning Brian Ferneyhough’s Bone Alphabet. Perspectives of New Music, Vol. 32, No. 1: 132-153
- Ferneyhough, B. “Duration and rhythm as compositional resources.” Collected Writings Eds. Boros, J.; Toop, R. Harwood Academic Publishers, 1995.

July 16th, 2008 at 3:44 pm
Dear Beau –
Thank you for linking to my YouTube posts. Sorry for disabling embedding. The ridiculous discourse and frivolity of comments and embedding often become so detached from my intentions in this piece that I decided to remove it. I do appreciate you taking the time to make a well-written post and comment about the piece. This rarely happens on YouTube. Lately I am finding more and more people taking the time to use YouTube as the impetus for serious study and discussion. Steven Schick is my teacher and mentor and hopefully he will also note the improvement in internet-based discussions about these video-documented performances. Perhaps he will endorse a posting of his own live recordings of Bone Alphabet onto YouTube. It’s a discussion I have had with him in the past.
I also have a hi-quality audio file of my studio recording of Bone Alphabet on my website. Please visit! rosskarre.synchronismproject.com
thanks again!
[below are some other interesting sites that use YouTube as a resource:]
http://johnsonsrambler.wordpress.com/2006/06/12/contemporary-classical-music-on-youtube/
http://www.youtube.com/user/mondayeveningconcert
July 16th, 2008 at 4:17 pm
Hey thanks very much for chiming in. Your performance of Bone Alphabet is really nice; seeing a body move and produce sound really makes the piece gel in a way that I think preemptively refutes many of the silly criticisms difficult music has to put up with. Also thanks for those YouTube tips, they’re awesome. I’m especially digging on that short Lachenmann preview. Good stuff.
It’d be great if you could talk Steven Schick into posting his work. I think lots of folk who would never otherwise get the chance would love to see it.